What are the strengths, weaknesses and future prospects for existing models of Care delivery?

 Mark Drakeford, the previous First Minister's senior special adviser, welcomes the opportunity of speaking on 'What are the strengths, weaknesses and future prospects for existing models of care delivery?' at our 24th March 2010 conference. (opens in a new window)

Improving Social Care in Wales

We are keen to capture innovative approaches and ideas, please tell us about your ideas for improving social care in Wales.

These can be fed into our enquiry and other work being undertaken by the HSCWB Network. Please add your comments by clicking on the comments button below

Scotland's free personal care policy?

13 June 2010

By Tom Peterkin

PRESSURE was last night mounting on Alex Salmond's government to re-examine Scotland's free personal care policy amid fears that it is too expensive to maintain.

Scotland on Sunday can reveal that a Scottish Government initiative looking at paying for the elderly population has found health experts and local government officials are warning ministers the policy can no longer be paid for.

 

There is also a growing belief that alternative methods of funding the policy such as introducing an insurance scheme must be explored to ensure people are looked after properly in old age.

A report published last week summarised the views expressed at a recent meeting of the government's "Reshaping Care" initiative, which was set up by the health minister Shona Robison.

"Free personal care is no longer affordable," was one of the conclusions recorded by the document, which reported the views of council officials, medical charities and health board officials who attended the meeting at Pittodrie Stadium, Aberdeen.

The experts who gathered for the government-sponsored meeting also reported that a "UK-wide insurance scheme should be considered".

The existence of the document came to light at the end of a week that saw the architect of the policy, Lord Sutherland, admit that free care ought to be reviewed.

Lord Sutherland said the health service should not be "sacrosanct" when it came to cuts, adding that free care had to "take its chances" against other policies.

Free personal care was the flagship policy of the first Labour/Lib Dem coalition. Since then it has been enthusiastically adopted by the SNP government.

A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "The Scottish Government remains absolutely committed to free personal care."

In Beveridge's footsteps - making care free for all

A National Care Service will be a radical Labour initative to rank with the NHS and welfare state

• • Andy Burnham
  • The Guardian, Tuesday 30 March 2010

 The National Care Service will save families from having to pay for elderly relatives who need support. Photograph: Jeffrey Coolidge/Getty Images

Now more than ever, Britain needs an invigorating election campaign that takes politics back to what it should be – a clash of ideas, a choice of values. In these pages on Saturday John Harris suggested that Labour's "dysfunctional relationship with its past", and a battle between old and new Labour, is standing in the way of a bold approach.

Not so. Ed Miliband is preparing a manifesto with radical ideas that, like all Labour's best social reforms down the decades, are not a choice between old and new Labour but a synthesis of the best instincts of both.

The National Health Service, the Open University, the national minimum wage, Sure Start – all policies true to Labour's roots but also speaking directly to the aspirations of the fair-minded majority.

And today we launch a policy which I believe is in the same tradition, of the same magnitude and with all the hallmarks of the best of Labour.

A new National Care Service, providing personal care and support to adults on the basis of need and free at the point of use, will ensure that an ageing society remains a decent and fair society.

It speaks directly to the aspirations of millions of families who want good quality care and support when they need it without the fear of losing their homes or their savings.

The social care system is the only remaining part of our welfare state that is not organised on a collective, population-wide, risk-sharing basis. When the welfare state was created, life expectancy was 12 years shorter. But, as we live longer, a sixth giant has emerged to add to Beveridge's five – fear of old age. Many older people today experience a real anxiety about the costs and quality of care. Too often they simply don't know what the future holds for them as they get old and frail.

That's because we currently have a random dementia tax – where people can see tens or hundreds of thousands of pounds wiped out by the costs of care, the loss of their homes, their savings and every ounce of their financial security. And, because we have an overstretched care system, it doesn't provide the dignity that all deserve. Families can face a wearying battle to get help and often find that it falls short. If we fail to reform this system now, unfairnesses will only intensify over the next decade.

Today's generation of pensioners are the first real home-owning generation. They rightly want to help their children and grandchildren; but their ability to do so is at risk in the cruel care lottery.

To make the National Care Service work, everyone will have to make a contribution. But because of this, the costs of covering everyone's care needs will be reduced. This means people of all incomes will get peace of mind in old age and be able to protect everything they have worked for. Like the NHS before it, it will end catastrophic care costs.

It is a policy that will promote social mobility, helping lower-income families keep their foothold on the property ladder. It is also an economic policy. Most of us can expect to be carers in later life and will need high-quality support and control over services if we are to make balancing work and caring possible. But, most importantly, it will promote a more positive vision of the ageing society, where older people are not always spoken of as a burden and can look forward to a retirement with peace of mind.

So this is a big choice for the country. It will require tough choices. Today I will propose reform in stages with a freeze on inheritance tax allowances for the next five years to begin this process, as well as moves to encourage more to work after 65.

It is unquestionably a major reform, and we need to continue to build a consensus around it. I will be asking the Tories again today to open their minds to the possibility of a comprehensive system. That's because it is clear to me that any voluntary system will not provide the long-term solution that the country is looking for. It is more expensive, pricing out many people in the middle and bottom third.

The future of care of older people brings the clash of ideas that this election desperately needs. As this is one of the biggest issues the country faces, it is right that it will at last be centre-stage in an election campaign.

There are, of course, risks for Labour in proposing the comprehensive, compulsory approach – but now is the time for strong hearts.

The National Care Service shows Labour still has the courage, confidence and capacity to shape a new century and a fairer society.